For this post - am not writing a new set. This is a cross post from Sikshana.blogspot.com
There is growing concern about PPP model in the secondary education (proposed).
Please see this posting :
http://sikshana.blogspot.com/2009/10/ppp-in-secondary-education_11.html#links
My comments on the post being
_____________________________________________________________
Dear ESR,
Long ago (while I was still fresh out of Ayn Rand readings), I was asked what should the government be responsible for. This was for a debate. I still remember that after much thought I had come down to the crux of governance and social equality that would be covered by
a. Defense
b. Law & Order
c. Healthcare
d. Education till 10th
Over time, having seen the power of government sanctions (where LAND and Industry allocations / grants are made) and having read the farce of boards eg. WAKF etc, I've come to add another item to this list and that is "livelihood". My guess is that the NREGS is possibly a close example.
Why the background - IMHO the government has NO business running the road business ?
Your concern on secondary education is very valid and is something that we need to discourage actively !
We, as a nation, are only growing to address the growing rural-urban divide by taking schools / hospitals and livelihood to the rural areas and NOT by allocating "x" % of seats in urban schools to the BPL section ?
Let us see how we can bring this under the bigger "urban-rural" divide discussion as that may have better traction / purchase ?
Your comments are valid. There is one more dangerous tendency creeping up on us. We tend to resort to tokenism whenever serious issues crop up and we are unable to tackle them. In this context, we are planning to set up ONE good school( Jawahar ? Morarji? Navodaya? ) in a District, as a sop. How does this help when the satisfaction ratio - if and when this is fully implemented- is likely to less than 5% ? And what sort of message does this send to the other schools and the kids studying in them?
ReplyDelete